<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Build-vs-Buy on Mathias WOLFF</title><link>https://www.blog-des-telecoms.com/en/tags/build-vs-buy/</link><description>Recent content in Build-vs-Buy on Mathias WOLFF</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><copyright>&lt;a href="https://www.blog-des-telecoms.com"&gt;Blog des télécoms&lt;/a&gt; © 2009 - 2026 by &lt;a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/mathias-wolff-47a7941/"&gt;Mathias WOLFF&lt;/a&gt; is licensed under &lt;a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/"&gt;CC BY-NC-SA 4.0&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="https://mirrors.creativecommons.org/presskit/icons/cc.svg" style="max-width: 1em;max-height:1em;margin-left: .2em;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://mirrors.creativecommons.org/presskit/icons/by.svg" style="max-width: 1em;max-height:1em;margin-left: .2em;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://mirrors.creativecommons.org/presskit/icons/nc.svg" style="max-width: 1em;max-height:1em;margin-left: .2em;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://mirrors.creativecommons.org/presskit/icons/sa.svg" style="max-width: 1em;max-height:1em;margin-left: .2em;"&gt;</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:13:25 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.blog-des-telecoms.com/en/tags/build-vs-buy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>When to Choose an All-in-One LLM Platform, When to Build Custom</title><link>https://www.blog-des-telecoms.com/en/blog/build-vs-buy-decision-framework/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:00:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://www.blog-des-telecoms.com/en/blog/build-vs-buy-decision-framework/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When I started laying out argentic-mw, I did what every engineer does before writing a line: look at what existed. I installed OpenClaw, I read Hermes Agent&amp;rsquo;s docs, I dug through repos, I ran scenarios by hand. Both projects are impressive and massively adopted, and I understand why: OpenClaw claims nearly 384,000 stars on GitHub, Hermes Agent sits around 218,000, and both promise a personal assistant that decides, acts and learns without intervention. It is seductive on paper and still seductive in use for a number of cases. For argentic-mw, it broke almost immediately, and not for reasons of model quality.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>